Bill English says there is no evidence that New Zealanders moving to Australia constitute a “special burden” on Australia. (Photo: RNZ / Rebekah Parsons-King)

Oz Kiwi opinion

We are somewhat baffled by Australian concerns that New Zealand is a ‘backdoor’ to Australia.

The two countries’ migration programmes are broadly similar and it would take a new arrival to New Zealand roughly six years to gain citizenship and thus the ability to move to Australia under free movement arrangements. This is hardly a quick and easy way to get into Australia!

The only difference of any substance is New Zealand’s provision for the entry of a little over a thousand migrants from Pacific nations each year under the Samoan Quota and Pacific Access Category. We know that Australian governments have objected to this on and off since the White Australia era.

Within the context of free movement arrangements, each country naturally has an interest in the migration policies adopted by the other. However, if one party has serious concerns, it should back these with evidence and work with the other party to address them. It is not acceptable to target to the other party’s citizens based on a gut feeling.

Unfortunately, the ‘backdoor migrant’ tag is too often used to smear New Zealanders of Asian and Pasifika background. Many are New Zealand-born. Others have lived in New Zealand for decades before moving to Australia. Some migrate to New Zealand and after several years find their careers lead them across the Tasman, as is supposed to be possible under the common labour market. Few come to New Zealand with the intent of circumventing Australian migration controls.

Australia considers NZ ‘soft entry’ point – PM

Benedict Collins, Political Reporter

Prime Minister Bill English says he does not understand why Australia thinks New Zealand is a backdoor route for migrants wanting to get into their country.

New Zealanders living in Australia have been stung by numerous new policies that affect their entitlements and rights in the past few years.

At his weekly post cabinet media briefing yesterday, Mr English said Australian officials believed this country had become a backdoor way for migrants to enter their country.

“We would like to, I suppose, understand precisely what their concern is, because there is no evidence that the New Zealanders moving to Australia constitute some unique or special burden on Australia,” he said.

Mr English said the economic evidence was that they were “good net contributors”.

The issue has been raised during government discussions about a common border, he said.

“This issue around whether New Zealand is a soft entry to Australia is one that in that context has come up.

“But it’s been quite hard to pin down just what exactly they think the problem is,” he said.

Time for an honest debate

Labour Foreign Affairs spokesperson David Parker said the government was being willfully blind.

“The Australians, as the Prime Minister has now admitted, are repeatedly raising these concerns about backdoor entry for some recent migrants – why is the government not addressing those issues?

“I would say that it is because they refuse to have an honest debate with New Zealanders about what the effects of these high rates of migration are on these New Zealand settings as well,” Mr Parker said.

And New Zealand First leader Winston Peters also said New Zealand was being used as a stepping-stone for migrants wanting to get into Australia.

Mr Peters said the Australian government could not be blamed for cracking down on the influx.

Where are the figures?

However, Green’s immigration spokesperson Denise Roche said Australia should not try to interfere with New Zealand’s policy settings.

“If that’s the feeling that Australia has then they should stump up with some statistics to show that it’s a problem … given Australia’s really harsh line towards Kiwis at the moment I don’t think we should play ball with them at all.”

Australia stunned the government last week when it announced that from next year, the fees New Zealanders would pay to study at Australian tertiary institutions would more than triple – affecting about 12,000 people.

Following that surprise, Foreign Minister Gerry Brownlee met with his Australian counterpart, Julie Bishop, in Sydney where he accepted the lack of a head’s up was a one-off.

But Mr English said Australia gave no assurance similar policies were not on the way.

He said the government had no interest in a tit-for-tat exchange with Australia and it would not be reducing entitlements or rights for their citizens in New Zealand.

[Read the Radio NZ article].